Power and welfare in noncooperative bargaining for coalition structure formation
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper, we investigate a noncooperative sequential bargaining game for allowing a group of agents agents to partition themselves into non-overlapping coalitions. We focus on the issue of how a player’s position on the bargaining agenda affects his power. We also analyse the relationship between the distribution of the power of individual players, the level of democracy, and the welfare efficiency of the game.
منابع مشابه
Bargaining for Coalition Structure Formation
Many multiagent settings require a collection of agents to partition themselves into coalitions. In such cases, the agents may have conflicting preferences over the possible coalition structures that may form. We investigate a noncooperative bargaining game to allow the agents to resolve such conflicts and partition themselves into non-overlapping coalitions. The game has a finite horizon and i...
متن کاملMultilateral Bargaining in Networks
We introduce a noncooperative multilateral bargaining model for a network-restricted environment, in which players can communicate only with their neighbors. Each player can strategically choose the bargaining partners among the neighbors and buy their communication links with upfront transfers. We characterize a condition on network structures for efficient equilibria: An efficient stationary ...
متن کاملMultilateral Bargaining in Networks: On the Prevalence of Inefficiencies
We introduce a noncooperative multilateral bargaining model for a network-restricted environment, in which players can communicate only with their neighbors. Each player strategically chooses the bargaining partners among the neighbors to buy out their communication links with upfront transfers. The main theorem characterizes a condition on network structures for efficient equilibria and shows ...
متن کاملCoalition Formation
This chapter surveys a sizable and growing literature on coalition formation. We refer to theories in which one or more groups of agents (“coalitions”) deliberately get together to jointly determine withingroup actions, while interacting noncooperatively across groups. The chapter describes a variety of solution concepts, using an umbrella model that adopts an explicit real-time approach. Playe...
متن کاملLegislative Bargaining under Weighted Voting
Organizations often distribute resources through weighted voting. We analyze this setting using a noncooperative bargaining game based on the Baron-Ferejohn (1989) model. Unlike analyses derived from cooperative game theory, we find that each voter’s expected payoff is proportional to her voting weight. An exception occurs when many high-weight voters exist, as low-weight voters may expect disp...
متن کامل